{
  "generated_by": "garpedia-page-model-exporter",
  "record": {
    "anchor_resolution_status": "not_applicable",
    "canonical_sections": [
      {
        "body": [
          {
            "citation_span_ids": [
              "TH-S09-SPAN-0001"
            ],
            "text": "This record presents a federal appellate opinion issued in December 2025 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the consolidated criminal appeals of Elizabeth Holmes and Ramesh Balwani, arising from their convictions related to the Theranos blood-testing enterprise. Counterpedia presents the independently captured document and its provenance chain; it does not restate the opinion's holdings as established facts outside their judicial posture and takes no position on any matter beyond what is carried by the capture record."
          }
        ],
        "heading": "Overview",
        "section_id": "th-s09-overview"
      },
      {
        "body": [
          {
            "text": "The underlying document was independently retrieved from the Ninth Circuit's public opinion datastore. This record structurally carries the capture's content digest, its downstream source-reference identifier, and a content-addressed custody manifest digest — recorded in the source's capture-integrity block below. It does not itself carry an independent verification report; verification, where performed, is a separate act recorded elsewhere. This paragraph is a Counterpedia provenance observation, not a claim supported by the cited source. Admission to this read-only pool is a presentation decision recorded by the corpus owner and establishes no authenticity, no signature validity, and no verification outcome."
          }
        ],
        "heading": "Provenance and scope",
        "section_id": "th-s09-provenance"
      }
    ],
    "citation_spans": [
      {
        "fragment_id": "TH-S09-FRAG-0001",
        "source_id": "TH-S09-SRC-0001",
        "span_id": "TH-S09-SPAN-0001",
        "supports_section_id": "th-s09-overview",
        "text": "Editorial paraphrase: the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order and amended opinion in December 2025 addressing the consolidated criminal appeals of two defendants convicted in connection with a blood-testing company. This span is a neutral summary, not a verbatim quotation of the opinion.",
        "verification_state": "unverified"
      }
    ],
    "corpus_lifecycle": "admitted",
    "cross_references": [],
    "current_edition": "TH-S09-ED-0001",
    "disputes": [],
    "editions": [
      {
        "edition_id": "TH-S09-ED-0001",
        "edition_number": 1,
        "released_at": "2026-08-19T00:00:00Z"
      }
    ],
    "entities": [],
    "exports": [],
    "intersections": [],
    "lineage": [],
    "page_id": "TH-S09-PAGE-0001",
    "profile": {
      "admission_boundary": "Admitted as a read-only presentation of an independently captured public appellate opinion with a recorded provenance chain. Presentation does not establish authenticity, signature validity, or verification outcome.",
      "id": "research_corpus",
      "label": "Research Corpus"
    },
    "projections": [],
    "provenance": {
      "source_kind": "public_appellate_opinion_with_external_capture"
    },
    "record_id": "TH-S09",
    "redaction": {
      "applies": false
    },
    "rendered_at": "2026-08-19T00:00:00Z",
    "route_slug": "/records/TH-S09",
    "slug": "ninth-circuit-amended-opinion-theranos-holmes-balwani",
    "sources": [
      {
        "capture_hash": "sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee",
        "capture_integrity": {
          "capture_referent": {
            "referent_id": "urn:counterpedia.source-reference:sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee:TH-S09",
            "referent_kind": "external_document",
            "referent_note": "Captured via counterpedia-acquisition HttpFetcher (arcs-amnesiac PR #124). ARCS Verify full_artifact_chain.v0_1 passed; authenticity_verified and signature_verified are not_evaluated per arcs-verify design. Bytes: 360184."
          },
          "integrity_class": "captured_bytes"
        },
        "description": "Independently captured public appellate opinion issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Presented as a provenance artifact; not quoted verbatim.",
        "label": "Ninth Circuit Order and Amended Opinion (captured public document)",
        "publication_status": "public",
        "slug": "ninth-circuit-amended-opinion-capture",
        "source_id": "TH-S09-SRC-0001",
        "source_type": "filing",
        "span_ids": [
          "TH-S09-SPAN-0001"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "status": "active",
    "subtitle": "A read-only presentation of an independently captured public federal appellate opinion. Counterpedia presents the captured artifact and its provenance chain; it does not restate the opinion's holdings as findings and asserts nothing beyond what the provenance record carries.",
    "title": "U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit — Order and Amended Opinion, United States v. Holmes and Balwani (Captured Public Document)"
  },
  "schema_family": "garpedia.rendered_record",
  "schema_version": 2
}