CounterpediaExplore knowledge. Follow the sources.

/examples/why-did-this-change

Why did this change?

Read a current state together with the earlier state, the retained change, its evidence, and its lineage.

Why did this change?

xz archive-member verification

The retained verification result changed; this projection does not infer a semantic change in the source.

Current

Attempt 2 is established after a retained recheck.

Earlier

Attempt 1 failed with ARCHIVE_MEMBER_DIGEST_MISMATCH.

What exactly changed?

  • Result changed

    Earlier
    Failed
    Current
    Established

    Owner field: outcome

  • Reason changed

    Earlier
    ARCHIVE_MEMBER_DIGEST_MISMATCH
    Current
    None retained

    Owner field: reason_code

  • Evidence artifact changed

    Earlier
    counterpedia:producer-observation:cap_5f7f5f62-09dd-408d-b46c-dd8a0123f240:hostile-expected-digest (sha256:5012262…32c70f)
    Current
    counterpedia:producer-observation:cap_5f7f5f62-09dd-408d-b46c-dd8a0123f240 (sha256:a01d15f…25fb6e)

    Owner field: artifact_ref, artifact_sha256

  • Relation to an earlier attempt changed

    Earlier
    None retained
    Current
    Recheck of Attempt 1

    Owner field: relation, prior_occurrence_id

Unchanged: Replay basis; Procedure; Method; Producer

Evidence

  • Amnesiac check-attempt history proof v0.2
  • Amnesiac check-attempt diff v0.1
  • The replay basis is unchanged across both retained attempts.

Lineage

  • Attempt 1 → Attempt 2
  • Attempt 2 carries the owner-provided recheck relation to Attempt 1.

Limits

  • A byte or result difference is not, by itself, a semantic change.
  • This surface does not infer currentness, truth, support, or which attempt is better.

This is a projection over owner-carried history; it does not create authority.

Why did this change?

Heppner governed lifecycle

The lifecycle moved through refusal, named reopening, revised admission, and later retirement.

Current

The proofcase is retired from the current admitted corpus.

Earlier

A revised state admitted the reopened work-product claim while preserving the final refusal.

What exactly changed?

  • Standing changed

    Earlier
    Candidate refused
    Current
    Retired from current corpus

    Owner field: Heppner lifecycle proof

  • Reopening condition changed

    Earlier
    new_evidence_admitted
    Current
    Satisfied for the reopened candidate

    Owner field: Heppner lifecycle proof

  • Unrelated final refusal unchanged

    Earlier
    Final refusal
    Current
    Final refusal

    Owner field: Heppner lifecycle proof

Unchanged: The earlier refusal remains retained history.

Evidence

  • Committed Heppner historical lifecycle proof
  • Source capture: sha256:b7bd04c056563e6864cc4fcb68ed62eff732eaacf812377d2d4f6d24fb9f920c
  • Verification reports retained: 2

Lineage

  • Initial reconsiderable refusal → named reopening → revised admission → terminal retirement
  • new_evidence_admitted

Limits

  • Reopening does not make the prior refusal false.
  • Retirement ends current standing without erasing historical states.
  • This projection carries lifecycle evidence; it does not create admission authority.

This is a projection over owner-carried history; it does not create authority.

This is a projection over owner-carried history. Open verification history or follow the evidence trail.