Source · Agent view
Ninth Circuit Order and Amended Opinion (captured public document)
Complete publishable Source read-model detail. This route does not invoke the Counterpedia Agent runtime and does not create new authority, support, admission, standing, or evidence.
Canonical identity
- schema_version
- counterpedia.source_agent_projection/v0.1
- canonical_ref
- TH-S09-SRC-0001
- object_kind
- source
- slug
- ninth-circuit-amended-opinion-capture
- source_type
- filing
- publication_status
- public
Exact public description
"Independently captured public appellate opinion issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Presented as a provenance artifact; not quoted verbatim."
Capture and integrity
- integrity_class
- captured_bytes
- capture_hash
- sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee
Exact capture projection
{
"integrity_class": "captured_bytes",
"capture_hash": "sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee",
"capture_referent": {
"referent_kind": "external_document",
"referent_id": "urn:counterpedia.source-reference:sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee:TH-S09",
"referent_note": "Captured via counterpedia-acquisition HttpFetcher (arcs-amnesiac PR #124). ARCS Verify full_artifact_chain.v0_1 passed; authenticity_verified and signature_verified are not_evaluated per arcs-verify design. Bytes: 360184."
}
}Public SourcePresence projection
- presence_schema_version
- counterpedia.source_presence_projection/v0.1
Host
unavailableHOST_FACTS_NOT_SUPPLIED
Reader access
unavailableNO_GOVERNED_SOURCE_PRODUCER_BINDING
Exposure
unavailableEXPOSURE_DECISIONS_NOT_SUPPLIED
Discovery lineage
unavailableNO_GOVERNED_SOURCE_PRODUCER_BINDING
Custody observations
availableExact public projection
[
{
"source_ref": "source:theranos:th-s09",
"resolution": "RESOLVED_TO_SOURCE_RECORD",
"source_record": {
"cp_source_id": "TH-S09-SRC-0001",
"slug": "ninth-circuit-amended-opinion-capture",
"label": "Ninth Circuit Order and Amended Opinion (captured public document)",
"source_type": "filing",
"publication_status": "public",
"capture_integrity_class": "captured_bytes"
},
"capture_association": {
"posture": "RETAINED_CAPTURE_ASSOCIATED",
"capture_identity": {
"acq_source_id": "src_c5b586b7572fe53c4799f6699d57516f",
"acq_capture_id": "cap_11f570f4-0ecc-4264-bb11-eb2ad69bc102"
},
"retained_capture_occurrence_count": 1,
"identity_resolution": {
"posture": "RESOLVED",
"cp_source_id": "TH-S09-SRC-0001",
"crosswalk_id": "crosswalk:95de4f9c915d57577dfcfa32",
"not_found_reason": null
},
"content_availability": "AVAILABLE"
},
"observations": [
{
"observation_ref": "page12:theranos:th-s09:http200",
"kind": "HTTP_RESPONSE",
"locator": "https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/12/22/22-10312.pdf",
"http_status": 200,
"capture_disposition": "CAPTURED"
}
]
}
]Family / organization context
{
"source_id": "TH-S09-SRC-0001",
"family": {
"disposition": "classified",
"primary": {
"family_id": "law_public_authority",
"label": "Law & Public Authority"
},
"secondary": []
},
"organizations": [
{
"organization_key": "ca9",
"label": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"role": "origin_authority",
"role_label": "Issued by"
}
]
}Documentary relations
unavailableNO_GOVERNED_ASSOCIATION_REF
Evidence relation state
{
"status": "unavailable",
"reason": "CLAIM_SOURCE_READ0_PENDING"
}Evidence relationship state
{
"status": "unavailable",
"reason": "NO_GENERAL_COMMITTED_ADJ1_BINDING_REGISTRY"
}Editions / currentness
unavailableNO_GOVERNED_PUBLIC_SRC1_BINDING