Counterpedia Source
Cooper & Grimmelmann academic paper, arXiv:2404.12590
Public registry representation of the already-canonical Cooper & Grimmelmann academic paper (arXiv:2404.12590), associated with the NYT/OpenAI litigation record as technical context. The retained capture is the arXiv abstract / landing page, not the paper PDF; no SourceEdition is adjudicated. Registration provides addressability and retained-byte posture only; it does not establish claim support, authenticity, truth, admission of the source itself, or an S1 identity association.
At a glance
What Counterpedia knows
- Original source access
- Open · current host observation 2026-10-05
- Counterpedia public exposure
- public registry visibility · Unavailable · exposure decisions not supplied
- Publisher / origin
- No governed publisher/origin binding
- Source family
- Science & Research
- Currentness
- Unavailable · src1 editions not supplied
Host routing
Origin, repositories, and archives
No governed publisher or origin organization is attached.
No governed repository route is attached.
Why Counterpedia shows this
Context around the source
This source is addressable in Counterpedia because it is present in the public Source Registry. Registry visibility, documentary association, retained custody, and claim support remain separate governed facts.
Admitted records citing this source
0
Associated entries
1
Evidence relationships
Claim relationships
Only governed Claim → SourceEdition → SourceRecord relationships appear here. Scores, confidence, independence, and truth are not computed by this page.
Unavailable · no general committed adj1 binding registry
Versions & history
Explicit editions and lifecycle
Unavailable · src1 editions not supplied
Discovery & access
Reader access and discovery provenance
Reader access observations
Open
Current host · direct unauthenticated read · HTTP 200
Observed 2026-10-05T12:00:00Z. An access observation at one time, not a guarantee of access now.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12590
Discovery lineage
Prospective discovery observation · not attempted
For this prospective discovery relation, no fetch was attempted and no capture or custody result is recorded. It says nothing about custody recorded separately for the source.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12590
Counterpedia holdings
Retained material and observations
Retained bytes are custody facts. They do not grant original-host access or public display permission.
Unavailable · source surface facts not supplied